|
Argentina still has a small herd available for sale. Until
1979 the national herd was composed by a few cows of English
origin in the beginning of the century. These cows were
not always milked or controlled, for they were more an object
for decoration in the country houses than a dairy cow with
productive value. This is why the genetic growth went slow.
As from the last years, the interest for the breed increased
and animals were imported from the United States, Canada,
Uruguay and New Zealand.
New generations of enthusiastic breeders created the AACJ
(Argentine Jersey Breeders Association) in the year 1981.
They began to spread the breed, improve its genetics and
organize fairs and dairy contests. But the active Jersey
cows in the country are still a few in relation to the current
demand. New breeders are now enlarging their herds, opening
new dairy farms, importing live cattle and implementing
embryo-transfers, so there are only a few cows available
for sale.
As from the year 2007, sexed semen becomes more popular
among commercial herds. This increased the number of born
female calves, which have a higher commercial value than
male calves.
Reasons to breed Jersey
The Jersey cow benefits every part of the dairy production chain with a higher economic yield:
-
The
dairyman, with a higher margin per hectare or per feeding
unit, since the Jersey produces more solids per hectare.
-
The industry with a higher yield in the manufactured product.
-
The consumer, for he consumes a milk richer in fat and protein, that is to say, more feed value.
The dairyman
The Jersey cow offers a higher economic return per supplies unit, based on its biological efficiency. This efficiency in production is measured by the percentage of intake that is derived in production.
Letīs take a look at the Oldenbroek essay (1986), in which the yield of 48 Jerseys is compared to that of 48 Holsteins with two types of diets. F (forage) with 60% pastures silage and 40 % corn silage, and C (concentrate) with 50 % 30 % pasture silage and 20 % corn silage, all of it ad libitum.
|
.
|
JERSEY
|
HOLSTEIN
|
|
Heads
|
48
|
. |
48
|
. |
|
Diet
|
C
|
F
|
C
|
F
|
|
DM Intake
|
3476
|
2884
|
4460
|
3567
|
|
EN.
|
3369
|
2550
|
4315
|
3176
|
|
DGP
|
451
|
323
|
579
|
404
|
|
Kg. Milk
|
3155
|
2762
|
4946
|
3753
|
|
Kg.
Fat
|
207
|
171
|
212
|
164
|
| Kg.
Protein
|
131
|
105
|
170
|
121
|
| Live
Weight in Kg.
|
350
|
324
|
511
|
491
|
| Gain
Kg.
|
66
|
27
|
96
|
72
|
|
Efficiency (% Intake EN.)
|
28
|
35
|
29
|
38
|
|
Weight Gain
|
13
|
1
|
17
|
6
|
|
Milk Energy
|
59
|
65
|
55
|
56
|
|
Jersey Advantage
|
7,2%
|
16%
|
. |
. |
|
Intake % per cow Per day
|
3,63
|
3,22
|
3,19
|
2,66
|
In the above chart we can observe that the Jersey derives more energy to the milk production than the Holstein in both cases. Researches agree in that this difference is not metabolic. It is directly related to its smaller size and its bigger intake capacity.
The production efficiency varies depending on the milk component.
Hence, the Jersey is more efficient in fat production, equally efficient in protein production, and less efficient in lactose production (and therefore, water production).
|